Daniel Negreanu had a bit of a rant in his Full Contact blog. I don’t have a problem with his complaints about Foxwood and their setup, but…
If you check his blog, he is disturbed about the blinds and a couple of other things. Until the UIGEA his site was part of th Ongame network. Ongame has as bad a blind structure as you can find on the net. My final tables there have all been crapshoots. Let’s compare them to a better site. They are a couple of minutes faster than most. The fast blind structure in an article I did on blinds was the Ongame structure. It makes no use of antes and the progression doubles the small blind more frequently than with other sites. I understand the need to progress
When was this article written? I agree with most of what you said but you should really get all the details straight before you publish it. OnGame does have NL Ring below 25-50c. You can clear bonus $$ playing tournaments and SNGs at UB. Daniel is moving off the Ongame network. And finally, do you really believe your UB account is cursed because noone can win when you let them use it to play at high limits? Come on.
Sorry it wasn’t clear. I was playing Limit at the time and that was the lowest blinds available. And I know that you can clear bonus playing SNG’s at Pokerroom — the skin of Ongame I was playing. And, no, I don’t think the UB account is cursed…but, just in case, would you know a good exorcist?