Differences

Math v. Mood is a constant at the tables and in the forums. You will attract trolls strongly supporting either method. When we learn we tend toward supporting the math side. And that is the best place to start. It is a foundation. Buildings and players need that. But, like the foundation for a new house, it is just the starting point.

For poker the foundation always remains a work in process. You can design a solid foundation for a bungalow. That is a static objective. For poker, the build is more like Mrs. Winchester’s Mystery Mansion. We need to always be adding on.

I’ve played SnGs, MTTs, and a mix of ring games. The common belief is that each is autonomous. You can play ring or tournament with one much better or worse. There is a bit of truth there but it is far from definitive. As we build a skill set, part will always translate. The better players pick up on that. Too many of us miss at least part of that. As a result we aren’t as adaptable. Brittleness in poker is fatal.

Early on, I had yes and no answers. I could discuss a hand history or situation in a black and white manner. Today, I have problems even finding the shade of gray. The problem of unintended consequences keep jumping onto the table. Answers seem to always come with a new question.

Another