Cookies on the PokerWorks Website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the PokerWorks website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookie settings at any time.

Continue using cookies

Poker News | World Poker News

Phil Ivey Admits to 'Edge Sorting' in Crockford's Punto Banco Controversy

Phil Ivey
Share this

In May the news hit that Phil Ivey was suing Crockfords, Britain's oldest casino, for refusing to pay Ivey's £7.8 million in winnings from a two-day Punto Banco session. The Daily Mail reported today that Ivey admits to being able to exploit flaws that are seen on the rear of the cards and was able to identify those flaws which gave him an unfair advantage.

Punto banco is a form of baccarat and has no skill factor, it's strictly luck based. Ivey admits to 'reading' the cards and that's how he won the cash but Ivey's admission is to being an 'advantage player' and not a cheater. Ivey's stand is that he used a legal method to pick up an advantage over the casino's edge.

Mayfair Club Crockfords takes a completely different stance. They believe that Ivey ‘acted to defeat the essential premise of the game’ and that he 'operated a scam' to gain an advantage over the casino.

Ivey brought an associate to the table with him — "Kelly" — who could read cards with printing errors, more than one deck change was made at Ivey's request. Deck changes are quite common in casino games where the stakes are high and those changes were apparently requested until Ivey's associate could identify printing errors by the way the cards were turned.

Ivey managed to go through the deck with the help of his associate until it was set in the manner he needed to start his run. He originally began with a wager of £50,000 a hand and once the deck was set, he asked for the limit to be raised to £150,000 a hand. It only took him a few hours to amass the win once everything was set.

Image courtesy of

In the beginning Crockfords said they would transfer Ivey's winnings to his bank account but an investigation by Crockford's security team changed everything after the Genting Group (parent company of Crockfords) transferred only his £1 million initial investment in the game, hence Ivey's initiation of the lawsuit.

There are numerous opinions on whether or not Ivey will get paid — if he acted as any knowledgeable player in the industry would act, or if the casino will prevail at the TwoPlusTwo forums.

Will Crockford's be forced to pay the full sum of Ivey's win — £7.8 million ($12.1 million) — or will Ivey end up out in the cold? Stay tuned.

It's time to follow PokerWorks on Twitter! And like us on Facebook to stay updated with poker news, events, and promotions.

News Flash

The IRS Scores Big at 2015 WSOP ME Final Table

The IRS managed to snag 34.13 percent from the payouts of the 2015 November Nine, totaling $8,467,091.

Read more

Quick Room Review

Bonus Room review

Subscribe to the Nightly Turbo

Be the first to know all the latest poker news, tournament results, gossip and learn all about the best online poker deals straight from your inbox.

RSS Feed